Ooh, whats in the box? |
The fact that the Wave
Rider shoe is on its 16th incarnation tells you that it is a popular
shoe. Sure, Mizuno haven’t always got it right (Just Google “Wave Rider 14” for
a barrage of internet vitriol) but it’s an ‘ever-present’ shoe that the running
community care about. I’ve been running in Wave Riders for a few years,
starting with the 13, and always found them solid, dependable and a
bit…well...boring. I ran well in the 15s during 2012, but they didn’t excite
me. I used the Brooks Launch for speed and races, they were the brylcreem boys
of my shoe collection. The Wave Riders were the dour house-wife/house-husband,
ready with dinner on the table when I got home. Other manufacturers would bring
out shiny running shoes to make you gasp and yearn (Adidas Bostons and definitely
you Saucony Kinvara) whilst the Wave Rider carried on as it always did. White,
boxy and no frills.
Temptation led me
elsewhere, shoe adultery if you like. I would plead with running shop owners to
show me alternatives for a light, neutral shoe that could handle high miles. I
would often get a puzzled look as the shop owner would shift awkwardly from
side-to-side “Well the Wave Rider is a very light shoe...” It was like there
was a conspiracy to keep me in these foot coffins.
I ignored their advice and
flirted with lower heel drops (see my review of the Saucony Mirage 2 here) and
different brands, but a bout of Achilles Trouble and a mountain of shoes that
appeared in the house led me to rethink.
So I decided to go back to
the Wave Rider for my VLM training. Only, by now, the 15 had been replaced with
the 16. Despite the reasonable large heel, this was the shoe I’d been searching
for. Sleek, light and in a fantastic “Fuck You Competition” colour.
There are styles of
running shoe that require a certain amount of confidence to wear. Stepping out in a garish pair of Adidas
Boston 3s, Adizero (or possibly even my old, beloved, Brooks Launch) says “I
feel the need, the need for speed” before standing to attention, chopping one
off and shooting off into the sunset aboard a Harley Davidson.
Mizuno appear to have
taken heed of this when giving the Updated Wave Rider 16 a paint job, producing
a vision in yellow. You can’t be timid in these trainers, there’s no hiding at
the back of the pack .You need to #gohardorgohome.
Mizuno have gone back to
the drawing board and designed it from first principles. The Upper is sleek and
considerably lighter, and tellingly, the whole shoe is now in the same weight
category as the Boston
3s. This is one light shoe, without all the bollocks that goes with barefoot
running (No I’m not convinced).
I’ll say it now - I’m in
love with this shoe.
Whatever you throw at it,
it handles with comfort and ease - Hills, Speed-work, Tempo Runs, Long Runs -
the works. I’m a mid-foot striker and was worried that the chunky heel would
feel like it was holding me back, But each session felt like putting on your
best racing shoes with the safety net of a bit of cushioning.
The fit is snug without
being Adidas-tight and the toe-box was definitely roomier than I expected. I
worried that I’d got a size too big but a couple of runs later and I didn’t
even notice it. 550 miles later and it's finally time to replace with a new pair. I think that's good going for a lighter shoe.
The one criticism I do have
with the Wave Rider is that the gap in the sole can get clogged up with stones when you go off-road, but
living in Liverpool that doesn’t happen very
often!
If you are looking for an
all-round shoe that means you won’t need to shell out on five different pairs
you can’t go far wrong with the Wave Rider 16. I’m a firm convert and will be
sticking with it after VLM, even in the face of the bright lights of the
much-hyped Adidas Boost and impending Kinvara 4.
I’m excited to see what
Mizuno choose to do with the Wave Rider 17. If it’s to give it an 8mm heel-to-toe
drop, I might just have found the perfect shoe.
I am looking for a Good Shoe after my Asics GEL 1150 gave up on me. I have got underpronation in my feet. Looking at Nike. Do you recommend any?
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid I'll have to defer you to your local running store. I'd hate to suggest something which might not be suitable or even worse cause injury. I've never had to run in stability shoes.
ReplyDeleteWhat I would say is that, personally, I've always found ASICS too bulky for my liking. Whenever I've tried them on in the shop they've felt like two Tanks on my feet.
I've never run in Nike but the Flyknit concept looks interesting. Thanks for reading the blog!
So you'll be running VLM in your Wave Riders? I was training in them earlier this year, but switched to a more minimal shoe (Skechers Go Bionics). I ran the LA Marathon in the Go Bionics. Great shoe, but my feet were really suffering from mile 18 onwards. I never had that problem when training with the Wave Riders, so am considering running VLM in them.
ReplyDeleteJust wanted to see what you think.
Yep, I will be running VLM in them.
ReplyDeleteWhilst minimal shoes may feel great for a 5/10k, I'm wary about how they'd feel at Mile 22.I PB'd at Bath Half in the Wave Riders, but that's irrelevant really.
Turning into one of my favourite quotes:
"Trainers don't make you fast, Training makes you fast"
Love that quote. And I decided that I'll definitely be running in my Wave Riders.
DeleteGood luck on Sunday. It will be a great day, I'm sure.